| 
                           
                          An Introduction to the 
                          Exhibition 
                          by Mark Hopkins 
                          Often 
                          disdained as drab in contrast to the more colorful 
                          legions of ethnographic pile weavings, “Baluch” 
                          artistry is nevertheless noteworthy for both the 
                          skillful subtlety of its colors and the bold 
                          creativity of its forms and motifs.  Here we share 
                          some examples of that with you. 
                          
                          All 
                          of these pieces originate from either northeastern 
                          Iran or northwestern Afghanistan.  None, despite the 
                          claims of early writers in the field, comes from the 
                          Baluchistan region of Pakistan, where weavers do not 
                          produce pile weavings.   
                          
                          Some 
                          of these pieces are truly from Baluch weavers; others 
                          are from nomadic and settled groups weaving “in the 
                          Baluch tradition.”  Much has been said about the 
                          tribal groups responsible for these weavings; the 
                          contributions of D.H.G. Wegner, Siawosch Azadi, Jerry 
                          Anderson, Michael Craycraft and other worthies have 
                          bequeathed the rug world with a dazzling array of 
                          tribal nomenclature, the precision of which, owing to 
                          a general lack of agreement, is not particularly 
                          convincing.  So while others bandy about such 
                          mouthfuls as Taimani, Timuri, Jamshidi, Bahluli and 
                          Yacubkhani, I preserve my sanity by thinking of them 
                          all as Damdifinoni and concentrating instead on the 
                          wonderful textile art that they – whoever they are -- 
                          have bequeathed us. 
                          
                          The 
                          age of these rugs is also subject to much speculation, 
                          simply because we have so little to go on.  I suspect 
                          half or more are from the 20th Century and 
                          a few may precede 1850.  But as you will note in the 
                          captions, no guesses are ventured here. 
                          
                          This 
                          is visual art that thrives, in or out of context, on 
                          its own merits.  Its colors, its forms, and its 
                          integration of the two into wonderful creations, are
                          simply here to be savored.  So enjoy. 
                          
                          MH 
                          
                          
                           
                          
                          
                           
  
                           |