Lakai Uzbek Ilgitsh
Central Asia

41

 

This sort of bag is described at some length by Kate Fitz Gibbon and Andy Hale in their Hali article.1  It is the classic ilgitsh or “mirror bag” form, although Fitz Gibbon and Hale suggest that most of these were essentially decorative, being too flimsily made to suit their ostensible purpose. This example is somewhat earlier than most now seen. Although attributed to the Lakai, it is far more directly beholden to urban forms than most “classic” Lakai pieces. Since many Lakai were sedentary and they were dispersed over a large territory, it is not surprising that such variations would occur. The decoration of the field is given graphic punch by the strong black outlining, which generates an interesting figure-ground tension. It otherwise consists of two alternating principal medallions in offset rows, with minor figures in the interstices that are also set within the semi-pinwheel forms created by the black outlining. The field could derive from various antecedents with alternating floral or palmette forms, although here they tend to look rather like shields. The mina khani field design of Persian rugs seems a possible source. This idea of a source in rug design is supported, if only adventitiously, by the manner in which cross-stitching is reminiscent of knotting. Although this technique is not quite as flexible as the other forms of embroidery, it can be employed more fluidly than in this piece, as is demonstrated in the small bags in No. 40. The border consists of schematized flowering plants with boteh-like flower heads derived from Indian textiles. They proceed in four alternating colors against a black ground.

The field is composed with great care, the first major figure in light blue dominating the corners and center, present again in rose at the center of each edge while four white figures guard the central one. The second principal medallion is united with the border by virtue of the presence of similar abstract flowering plants at the center of each. The secondary medallions seem to be losing their coherence, yet they sport little red flowering plants (with , however, only one set of “leaves”). These plants point upwards in the two lower ranks and downwards in the two upper ranks, keeping the careful symmetry of the design intact. Characteristically, a full nine colors are used to form the palette; however, an emphasis on strong contrasts helps keep the design from being insipid. Again, the corrosive crimson wool so common in Uzbek embroideries of the later 19th century is present. Light green and aubergine are only added for detailing, such as the green crosses with yellow centers at the center of each major medallion of the first type.

The back is composed of three different examples of imported printed cotton, one simply across the top, another striped example with floral patterning forming the principal part, a third visible at the bottom, lying beneath the second.

JBS

1) Fitz Gibbon, Kate & Andrew Hale, “The Bad Beys of Central Asia,” Hali 75, June-July 1994, pp. 70-76

  

Additional Images

 

Back

Detail 1

Detail 2

 
 
    

Structural Data:

Size:

14 x 12  (36 x 30 cm.)

Foundation:

Cotton warp, ivory on a 2:2 ratio, with cotton ivory wefts and, in one section, blue/green cotton wefts.

Stitching:

Z singles and Z2S wool; also white and green silk, Z singles; cross stitch

Edges:

Turned under and sewn overcast with cochineal color wool; Z4S and with ivory silk, Z2S

Loops:

Four part plaited green wool, Z2S; attached with light blue wool, Z2S; and with S6Z(2S) blue silk; intricate tassel of dark brown wool, S2Z, with covering of yellow and orange wool braided cap, bound with heavy cord of handspun ivory cotton.

Backing:

Balanced plain weave cotton fabric; block print design of floral stripes

   

Online Exhibition:

To Have and To Hold


Copyright
© 2004, New England Rug Society, All Rights Reserved