2

Probably Western Anatolia

Fragment of a "Transylvanian" Rug, 1st half of the 17th century

This fragment includes part of the field and side border of a "Transylvanian" rug, named for the district (now in central Romania) where many rugs with similar designs were found in the early 1900s. During the 17th and 18th centuries, it was customary for wealthy families of the area to donate these rugs to local Protestant churches, which displayed and preserved them.

"Transylvanian" rugs are usually thought to have been woven in western Turkey, but minority opinion ascribes them to Ottoman- controlled areas of southeastern Europe.1   They were exported in substantial numbers to western Europe, and some made their way to colonial America.2  

When intact, this rug had a "double niche" field that contained angular, flowering vines cascading or climbing from vases at each end. Its main border design of alternating cartouches and eight-pointed stars is shared by other "Transylvanian" rugs of early manufacture; later examples have only a series of cartouches. The red and brown reciprocal trefoils flanking the main border are also replaced by other designs on later rugs.3   Like many other elements of early Ottoman rugs, however, these reciprocals have survived in 19th-century Anatolian weaving - reused, for instance, in the end panels of a western Anatolian yastik in this exhibition (cat. no. 6).

J.B.


1. For the two views see, respectively, Jon Thompson, "Transylvanian Rugs: a Distinctive but Controversial Group," in The Sarre Mamluk, London, Lefevre & Partners, May 23, 1980, pp. 18-21; and Ellis, nos. 31-33, pp. 92-101.

2. For example, an early "Transylvanian" rug, with similar borders and field but different corner design, is depicted in Thomas de Keyset's Portrait of Constantijn Huygens and his Clerk, dated 1627, London, National Gallery (reproduced in John Mills, Carpets in Paintings, London, National Gallery, 1983, pl. 28). Also see the essay, "Early Rug Collectors of New England," in this catalogue, p. 13, and note I. 

3. For comparable examples of intact rugs, see The Sarre Mamluk, pp. 24- 25, and Roland Gilles, et al., Tapis: Present de I'Orient a I'Occident, Paris, Institut du Monde Arabe, 1989, pp. 124-125.

 
      
 
 
Structural Analysis
SIZE:  47 x 23 1/2 in. (119.4 x 59.7 cm.)
WARP: wool, Z2S, depressed; ivory, bottom dipped yellow
WEFT: wool, z x 2-3; light red
PILE:  wool, Z2S, symmetrical knots pulled to the left, h. 10, v. i2, 120 k/sq. in.; ivory, tan, dark brown, light brown, red, gold, light gold, green, blue-green, blue, light blue
ENDS: missing
SIDES: missing
   
NOTE: Although "Transylvanian" rugs are reported by some authorities to have pile knotted in single strands of z-spun yarn (see Ellis, as cited above), two very loosely z-spun (and indiscernibly s-plied) strands of yarn were observed to have been used for all the pile colors of this rug except the browns, which appeared to be z singles.

 

 

THROUGH THE COLLECTOR'S EYE
Oriental Rugs from New England Private Collections